<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Erlang.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sheysrebellion.net/blog/2008/02/11/on-erlang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sheysrebellion.net/blog/2008/02/11/on-erlang/</link>
	<description>I sleep with pillows on my head.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:37:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abhi</title>
		<link>http://www.sheysrebellion.net/blog/2008/02/11/on-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-17640</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sheysrebellion.net/blog/2008/02/11/on-erlang/#comment-17640</guid>
		<description>Hey Shey.

I did the same thing a couple months ago. Picked up the pragmatic programmers&#039; book on Erlang as I took a couple weeks off at the end of the year. You really have to start thinking differently, more in math terms unlike procedural or OO design.

The syntax is a bitch. Up til now I was going the other way - Java to Ruby/Groovy where the syntax was less restrictive, more elegant. With Erlang, I could never remember whether a line needed a comma or a period. 

I think what&#039;s less important than the &quot;half the lines of code&quot; is the fact that in some sense you have a guarantee that your code is thread safe. 

Definitely a lot of fun.

Catch you later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Shey.</p>
<p>I did the same thing a couple months ago. Picked up the pragmatic programmers&#8217; book on Erlang as I took a couple weeks off at the end of the year. You really have to start thinking differently, more in math terms unlike procedural or OO design.</p>
<p>The syntax is a bitch. Up til now I was going the other way &#8211; Java to Ruby/Groovy where the syntax was less restrictive, more elegant. With Erlang, I could never remember whether a line needed a comma or a period. </p>
<p>I think what&#8217;s less important than the &#8220;half the lines of code&#8221; is the fact that in some sense you have a guarantee that your code is thread safe. </p>
<p>Definitely a lot of fun.</p>
<p>Catch you later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shey</title>
		<link>http://www.sheysrebellion.net/blog/2008/02/11/on-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-17637</link>
		<dc:creator>Shey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sheysrebellion.net/blog/2008/02/11/on-erlang/#comment-17637</guid>
		<description>Ben:  I&#039;m following along with the pragmatic press book which is much better than their Ruby book and their rails book.  One gripe, Armstrong doesn&#039;t cover sequential (non concurrent) Erlang enough.  If you&#039;re new to functional programming I recommend reading http://www.erlang.org/download/erlang-book-part1.pdf.

James:  It took me forever! I&#039;m thinking it&#039;s because I&#039;m a total noob and I&#039;m not used to recursive solutions.  So far the code&#039;s been pretty readable, Erlang&#039;s a small language but I&#039;m sure the syntax will get insane soon.

Before deciding on Erlang I looked at a couple of other functional programming languages and one thing that really turned me off was the syntax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben:  I&#8217;m following along with the pragmatic press book which is much better than their Ruby book and their rails book.  One gripe, Armstrong doesn&#8217;t cover sequential (non concurrent) Erlang enough.  If you&#8217;re new to functional programming I recommend reading <a href="http://www.erlang.org/download/erlang-book-part1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.erlang.org/download/erlang-book-part1.pdf</a>.</p>
<p>James:  It took me forever! I&#8217;m thinking it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m a total noob and I&#8217;m not used to recursive solutions.  So far the code&#8217;s been pretty readable, Erlang&#8217;s a small language but I&#8217;m sure the syntax will get insane soon.</p>
<p>Before deciding on Erlang I looked at a couple of other functional programming languages and one thing that really turned me off was the syntax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Thigpen</title>
		<link>http://www.sheysrebellion.net/blog/2008/02/11/on-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-17636</link>
		<dc:creator>James Thigpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sheysrebellion.net/blog/2008/02/11/on-erlang/#comment-17636</guid>
		<description>It may have taken half the lines, but how much time did it take?  (I&#039;m not being pedantic I&#039;d really like to know how it compared).  ALSO, how readable is the code?  That&#039;s beef #482 with me and functional languages: they&#039;re so syntax-y.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may have taken half the lines, but how much time did it take?  (I&#8217;m not being pedantic I&#8217;d really like to know how it compared).  ALSO, how readable is the code?  That&#8217;s beef #482 with me and functional languages: they&#8217;re so syntax-y.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Scheirman</title>
		<link>http://www.sheysrebellion.net/blog/2008/02/11/on-erlang/comment-page-1/#comment-17620</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Scheirman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sheysrebellion.net/blog/2008/02/11/on-erlang/#comment-17620</guid>
		<description>Are you following the pragmatic press book?  I&#039;ve heard it&#039;s pretty in-depth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you following the pragmatic press book?  I&#8217;ve heard it&#8217;s pretty in-depth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
